Category Archives: Blogs

A conversation about leaving your job can be unsettling, particularly when an employer presents a document and asks for a quick decision. The workplace settlement process is designed to create a legally binding agreement between employer and employee, but it should not require you to give up valuable employment rights without understanding exactly what you receive in return.

For employees, the key is to take advice before responding substantively or signing. For employers, the priority is a fair, properly documented process that gives both sides clarity and reduces the risk of a future dispute. A settlement agreement can achieve an amicable exit, but only when the terms and process are handled carefully.

What the workplace settlement process involves

A settlement agreement is a written contract used to settle specific employment claims or potential claims. In practical terms, an employee agrees not to bring certain claims against their employer, usually in return for a financial package and agreed terms about their departure.

The process often begins after redundancy discussions, a performance or disciplinary issue, a grievance, a workplace dispute or a proposed change in senior leadership. It may also arise where both parties accept that the working relationship has come to an end, even though neither wishes to pursue a formal dispute.

Receiving an offer does not mean you must accept it. Nor does it necessarily mean your employer believes you have done anything wrong. It is a proposal for a negotiated exit, and its value depends on the circumstances, the legal claims being waived and the quality of the terms offered.

1. The initial conversation or proposal

An employer may raise settlement terms in a meeting, by telephone or in writing. Sometimes this is described as a protected conversation. In other situations, it may be a without prejudice discussion where there is an existing dispute.

These labels matter, but they do not make every conversation automatically confidential or inadmissible in a tribunal. Protected conversations have limits, particularly where discrimination, whistleblowing, harassment, breach of contract or improper behaviour is alleged. The facts and the way the discussion was conducted can be as important as the label attached to it.

You should ask for the proposal and draft agreement in writing. Avoid feeling pressured into an immediate response. ACAS guidance generally indicates that employees should be given a reasonable period to consider a written offer, with 10 calendar days often used as a helpful benchmark. A shorter deadline is not automatically unlawful, but it may be unreasonable depending on the circumstances.

2. Review the proposed terms in full

The headline payment is only one part of the agreement. A proper review considers what you are being asked to waive and whether the overall package reflects your position.

The agreement should set out your termination date, notice arrangements, payments, holiday entitlement and any benefits that continue until your employment ends. It should also identify the claims being settled. This is significant: you may be waiving rights relating to unfair dismissal, discrimination, unpaid wages, redundancy, holiday pay or other statutory and contractual claims.

Particular attention is often needed for confidentiality clauses, restrictive covenants and the reference. A broad confidentiality clause might affect what you can say about your employment, while restrictive covenants can restrict the work you do after leaving. An agreed reference can be especially valuable where you are seeking a new role and want certainty rather than relying on a future discretionary response from your former employer.

Independent legal advice is required

A settlement agreement is not valid simply because both parties sign it. Under UK employment law, the employee must receive advice from an independent adviser on the agreement and its effect on their ability to bring claims.

The adviser must be appropriately qualified, named in the agreement and covered by professional indemnity insurance. The agreement must also be in writing and relate to particular complaints or proceedings. These formalities protect employees from signing away rights without informed advice.

Employers commonly make a contribution towards the employee’s legal fees. This is usually intended to cover a straightforward independent advice appointment and signing process. Where negotiation or substantial amendments are needed, the legal costs may exceed that contribution. That does not mean negotiation is unwise. It simply means the likely value of improved terms should be considered against the work required.

At Arcos Settlement Agreements, the focus is on clear, independent advice about what the document means, what is fair in context and whether any terms should be improved before signature.

What an adviser should check

A settlement agreement review should go beyond confirming that the document is legally valid. It should assess the practical and financial effect of the terms, including:

• whether the compensation properly reflects notice pay, accrued holiday, statutory redundancy pay and the potential value of any claims;
• whether the tax wording correctly distinguishes taxable earnings from compensation payments;
• whether proposed confidentiality obligations are reasonable and allow appropriate disclosures, including to legal and professional advisers;
• whether restrictive covenants are new, extended or more onerous than those in your employment contract; and
• whether the reference, announcement and departure arrangements protect your professional reputation.

The right answer depends on the facts. A modest offer may be reasonable where there is a genuine redundancy situation, a full contractual notice payment and limited scope for claims. The same figure may be inadequate if there are concerns about discrimination, a flawed process, unpaid sums or a senior role with substantial contractual benefits.

Negotiating a better settlement agreement

Negotiation does not have to be hostile. A calm, evidence-based response is often the most effective approach. It can explain that you are willing to reach an agreement but need particular terms amended before you can sign.

Compensation may be negotiable, but so can many non-financial provisions. Employees frequently seek an agreed reference, a longer notice period on garden leave, removal or narrowing of post-termination restrictions, an agreed internal announcement, contribution to legal fees, or a clearer tax indemnity. If you hold shares, options, commission entitlement or a bonus, those points need specific attention rather than an assumption that standard wording will deal with them fairly.

Employers should avoid treating a settlement agreement as a standard form with only the payment figure changed. An agreement that is overreaching, unclear or issued with unnecessary pressure can undermine trust and create avoidable risk. A commercially sensible agreement addresses the real issues, gives the employee adequate time and records the arrangements accurately.

Tax, notice pay and compensation

Tax treatment is often misunderstood. Payments such as salary, holiday pay, bonuses and contractual notice pay are usually subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance in the normal way. The tax position for termination compensation is more nuanced.

In many cases, the first £30,000 of a genuine termination payment can be paid free of income tax, but that is not a blanket exemption for every sum described as compensation. Post-employment notice pay rules can mean that part of a termination package is taxable even where the agreement uses a different label. Employer National Insurance contributions may also apply to relevant termination payments above £30,000.

The agreement should state how payments are intended to be treated for tax purposes. It may include a tax indemnity, but this should be reviewed carefully. An employee should not accept unnecessarily broad responsibility for tax arising from the employer’s own treatment of payments.

Before you sign: practical checks

Read the final version, not an earlier draft. Check that every negotiated change has been included and that payment dates are clear. If a reference has been agreed, it should usually be attached as a schedule so there is no uncertainty about its wording.

You should also confirm what will happen to company property, access to systems, expenses, private healthcare, pension contributions, shares and any bonus or commission. If you have a new role lined up, ensure that restrictive covenants and confidentiality wording will not create a problem. If you do not yet have another role, consider whether an agreed announcement and a positive reference will support your next move.

Do not sign because the document appears routine or because you want the situation over quickly. A settlement agreement is often final once signed, and it is intended to prevent future claims covered by its terms. A short period of careful advice can make a significant difference to your financial security and your transition.

A good settlement process should leave both sides with certainty, not unanswered questions. Take the time to understand the terms, ask for changes where they are justified and only sign when the agreement reflects a fair and workable way forward.

A proposed exit can feel urgent, particularly when an employer presents a figure and asks for an answer within days. The choice between an employee settlement versus tribunal claim is not simply about accepting money now or standing up for yourself later. It is about weighing certainty, time, evidence, future plans and the rights you may be asked to give up.

A settlement agreement can provide a clean, confidential and agreed ending. A tribunal claim can provide a formal route to challenge unlawful treatment. Neither is automatically the better option. The right decision depends on the facts, the strength of any potential claims and whether the proposed terms properly reflect what you are being asked to waive.

What a settlement agreement actually does

A settlement agreement is a legally binding contract between you and your employer. In return for agreed payments or other benefits, you usually agree not to bring specified employment claims against them. These may include claims relating to unfair dismissal, discrimination, redundancy, holiday pay, notice pay, whistleblowing or unpaid wages.

For the agreement to be valid, it must be in writing, identify the particular claims being settled and confirm that you have received independent legal advice from a qualified adviser. Your adviser must also have appropriate insurance. This is why an employer will commonly offer to contribute towards your legal fees.

The adviser’s role is not merely to witness your signature. They should explain what rights you are giving up, check whether the wording is legally effective and identify points worth changing. That may include the payment amount, the tax wording, notice arrangements, a reference, confidentiality obligations, restrictive covenants and the deadline for signing.

A settlement agreement does not mean your employer has proved they would win at tribunal. Equally, it does not mean you would necessarily win a claim. It is a negotiated solution to avoid the uncertainty and cost of a dispute.

Employee settlement versus tribunal claim: the practical difference

The central difference is control. A settlement allows both sides to agree an outcome and timetable. A tribunal process places the dispute in a formal system, where a judge ultimately decides the issues if the case does not resolve beforehand.

With a settlement, you know the proposed financial outcome before signing. Payment is usually made within an agreed period after the agreement becomes binding and your employment ends, although the precise terms vary. You can also negotiate practical matters that a tribunal may not order, such as an agreed reference, an announcement to colleagues, return of company property arrangements or the wording of restrictive covenants.

A tribunal claim may lead to compensation, a declaration or, in limited situations, reinstatement or re-engagement. But the outcome is uncertain. You may need to prepare a detailed account, disclose documents, obtain witness evidence and attend hearings. Even a strong claim can take many months to reach a final hearing. The process can be demanding while you are looking for a new role or recovering from a difficult workplace experience.

Tribunal proceedings are generally public. Although hearings may sometimes involve reporting restrictions or privacy measures, confidentiality cannot be assumed. A settlement agreement, by contrast, commonly contains mutual confidentiality provisions, though these cannot lawfully prevent protected disclosures or reporting certain matters to regulators, the police or professional advisers.

Start with the value and strength of your potential claims

Before comparing the offer with a possible tribunal award, establish what claims may exist. The answer is often more complicated than the employer’s label for the situation. A redundancy process may involve unfair selection. A performance process may be connected to disability, pregnancy, age, race, sex or another protected characteristic. A resignation may potentially amount to constructive dismissal if there has been a serious breach of contract.

The evidence matters as much as the allegation. Useful material may include your contract, policies, appraisals, emails, meeting notes, grievance documents, pay records and a clear timeline. A claim is stronger where there is reliable evidence supporting the legal issue, not simply where the treatment felt unfair.

There are also limits on tribunal compensation. In an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, for example, awards are subject to statutory rules and caps, and compensation can be reduced if you would have been dismissed fairly in any event. Discrimination and whistleblowing claims do not have the same compensation cap, but they still require evidence, legal analysis and proof of financial loss or injury to feelings.

A settlement figure should therefore be assessed against the realistic value of your case, rather than the highest possible outcome. It should also be considered alongside sums you are already entitled to receive, such as salary to the termination date, accrued holiday, notice pay, bonus or commission under your contractual terms. These existing entitlements are not necessarily compensation for giving up claims.

Do not overlook time limits

Employment tribunal time limits are short. Most claims must be started within three months less one day of the act complained of or the end of employment, although some claims have different rules. Raising a grievance or negotiating informally does not usually extend that deadline.

Before lodging most tribunal claims, you must notify Acas and begin Early Conciliation. This pauses the clock in accordance with statutory rules, but it is not sensible to leave the process until the final day. If settlement discussions are ongoing and the deadline is approaching, obtain advice promptly so that your position is protected.

An employer may set a short deadline for a proposed agreement, but that does not remove your right to take independent advice. Where more time is needed to review the terms or make a reasoned counterproposal, it may be possible to ask for an extension. Pressure to sign quickly is itself a reason to slow down and understand the document.

When settlement may be the sensible route

Settlement can be particularly attractive where you want certainty, a timely payment and a professional ending. It may be appropriate if you have a new job to move to, wish to avoid the personal strain of litigation, or value an agreed reference and confidential departure.

It can also make sense where there is a genuine dispute about the evidence. A tribunal is not a guaranteed route to compensation, and legal costs are not routinely recovered by the successful party in employment tribunals. While costs orders are possible in some circumstances, each side will often bear its own legal costs.

That said, a settlement should not be accepted simply because it has been presented as standard. Standard wording can still contain unusually broad confidentiality clauses, restrictive covenants that go beyond your contract, poorly drafted tax provisions or a reference that is less helpful than promised verbally. The full package matters.

When a tribunal claim may deserve serious consideration

A claim may be worth pursuing where the offer is low compared with the realistic value of the rights being waived, where an employer refuses to address a serious concern, or where the evidence points to unlawful discrimination, retaliation or whistleblowing detriment. It may also be the right course if you do not want confidentiality terms that restrict what you can say about your experience within lawful limits.

Some employees need a formal finding or want their employer’s actions tested independently. That is a legitimate consideration. However, it should be balanced against the length of proceedings, the emotional commitment involved and the possibility that the tribunal’s decision may not match either side’s expectations.

A tribunal claim and settlement discussions are not always alternatives at the outset. Many disputes settle during Acas Early Conciliation or after a claim has been issued. Protecting a deadline does not necessarily mean you are committing yourself to a final hearing.

How to assess a proposed agreement before deciding

Read the offer as a complete arrangement, not just a headline number. Ask what payments are contractual, what amount is genuinely compensation, when you will be paid and how each element is intended to be taxed. Notice pay, holiday pay and salary are usually taxable. The tax treatment of an ex gratia termination payment requires careful drafting and depends on the circumstances.

Check whether you will receive an agreed reference, and ask to see the wording rather than relying on a verbal assurance. Consider whether any post-termination restrictions are acceptable for your next career move. Review confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions for fairness and clarity, including any duties placed on the employer.

You should also understand the claims list. A valid agreement may settle a wide range of statutory and contractual claims, including claims you had not considered. Clear, independent advice gives you the chance to decide whether the compensation is sufficient for that waiver and whether a counteroffer is appropriate.

At Arcos Settlement Agreements, the focus is on giving employees plain-English, independent advice on the terms in front of them, so they can sign, negotiate or decline with confidence.

The most helpful next step is rarely to react to the first number. Preserve relevant documents, note the key dates, obtain advice on your rights and consider what outcome would genuinely allow you to move forward fairly.

A proposed exit payment can look reassuring on paper, but the figure you receive is not necessarily the figure you can rely on month to month. If you are asking, can settlement agreement affect benefits, the short answer is yes. It can affect entitlement, the amount you receive and the date payments change, particularly where you claim Universal Credit or other means-tested support.

The detail matters. Benefits rules may treat notice pay, holiday pay, redundancy pay and compensation differently. The wording of the agreement, when you receive the money and what you do with it can all have practical consequences. Before signing, obtain clear, independent advice on the agreement itself and consider speaking to a welfare-benefits adviser or the relevant benefits office about your personal claim.

How a settlement agreement can affect benefits

A settlement agreement commonly records the end of employment and sets out payments in return for you agreeing not to bring certain legal claims. Those payments may include salary owed up to your termination date, holiday pay, payment in lieu of notice, statutory or enhanced redundancy pay, and a separate compensation payment.

For benefits purposes, these categories are not interchangeable. A payment described as tax-free compensation does not automatically receive the same treatment under benefits rules. Equally, a settlement sum paid after your employment ends may still affect a means-tested claim because it increases the capital available to you.

The key question is usually not simply whether you have signed a settlement agreement. It is what you have been paid, when it was paid and which benefit you receive.

Universal Credit and capital limits

Universal Credit is means-tested. Money received under a settlement agreement may count as capital once it is in your bank account, unless a specific disregard applies. Capital includes savings and investments, as well as cash held in current accounts.

As a general rule, capital below £6,000 does not reduce Universal Credit. Capital between £6,000 and £16,000 can reduce the award, and capital above £16,000 will usually mean that you are not entitled to Universal Credit. There are exceptions and transitional arrangements in some cases, so do not assume the standard rule settles your position.

This can be difficult for someone who receives a lump sum intended to cover a period while they find another role. A payment may provide useful financial breathing space, yet it may also reduce or end Universal Credit for a time. That is not necessarily a reason to reject the offer, but it is a reason to understand the real financial outcome before agreeing terms.

Final pay and notice payments

Salary, accrued holiday pay, bonuses and payment in lieu of notice are often treated differently from a genuine compensation payment. They may be treated as earnings and can affect Universal Credit in the assessment period in which they are received.

Timing therefore matters. Universal Credit is assessed in monthly periods linked to your claim date. Receiving a final payment one day earlier or later can sometimes produce a different short-term result. Your employer may have payroll constraints, and an agreement should not be drafted solely around a benefits outcome, but it is sensible to ask how and when each sum will be paid.

A clear payment breakdown is valuable. It should state what each amount represents rather than presenting one unexplained total. This supports proper tax treatment and gives you clearer information when reporting the payment to the Department for Work and Pensions.

Tax treatment is not the same as benefits treatment

Many employees have heard that the first £30,000 of a qualifying termination payment can be paid free of income tax. That tax position is often relevant when negotiating a settlement agreement, but it does not answer the benefits question.

Payments such as contractual notice pay, holiday pay and wages are normally taxable. A genuine compensation payment may receive more favourable tax treatment, subject to the circumstances and the terms agreed. However, a tax-free payment can still count as capital for Universal Credit and other means-tested support once you receive it.

This is one reason not to focus only on the headline settlement figure. Ask for a schedule showing gross amounts, deductions, the anticipated payment date and how each element is described. A solicitor reviewing the agreement can check whether the proposed tax wording reflects the arrangement, although HMRC and the benefits authorities ultimately apply their own rules.

Other benefits may be affected differently

Not every benefit is means-tested. New Style Jobseeker’s Allowance and New Style Employment and Support Allowance are generally based on your National Insurance contribution record rather than your savings. A settlement payment will not usually reduce these benefits simply because it increases your capital.

That said, the rules can still be affected by circumstances such as work, earnings, pension income, availability for work or limited capability for work. If you are receiving a legacy benefit, Housing Benefit or Council Tax Reduction, different rules may apply. Council Tax Reduction schemes are run locally, so the treatment of a payment can vary by council.

Personal Independence Payment is not means-tested, so savings and settlement compensation do not normally affect it. It is based on how a health condition or disability affects daily living and mobility. However, changes in your health or circumstances should still be reported where required.

Do not give away money to preserve entitlement

A common concern is whether you can spend or transfer a settlement payment before making, or continuing, a claim. There is a real distinction between reasonable spending and deliberately reducing capital to obtain or increase benefits.

Using a payment for ordinary living costs, rent, mortgage payments, essential repairs, debt repayments or costs connected with finding work may be entirely understandable. The facts matter, including whether the expense is reasonable in your circumstances. Giving away substantial sums, moving money into another person’s account or buying assets primarily to get below a capital limit may lead to a decision that you have deliberately deprived yourself of capital.

If that happens, the DWP may assess you as though you still possess the money. Keep records of significant spending and seek welfare-benefits advice before taking an unusual step with a settlement sum.

What to check before you sign

A settlement agreement needs independent legal advice to be legally valid, and your adviser should explain the rights you are waiving and whether the financial terms are fair. Benefits are a separate specialist area, but there are practical questions worth raising during the review.

Ask whether the agreement clearly separates pay, notice, holiday, redundancy and compensation. Check the termination date, payment dates and whether amounts will go through payroll. If there is a proposed payment in instalments, ask what happens if an instalment is missed and whether the timing works for your wider financial position.

You should also check whether the employer will pay an agreed contribution towards your legal fees, whether your reference is attached or agreed, and whether post-termination restrictions could limit the work you can take next. These points affect the value of the overall package, even though they do not directly determine benefit entitlement.

For employees receiving Universal Credit, report changes promptly and accurately. Provide the agreement and payslips if requested, but do not assume an automated calculation has categorised the payment correctly. If a decision does not reflect the payment’s nature or timing, you may be able to ask for it to be reconsidered.

Can settlement agreement affect benefits if you are made redundant?

Yes. Redundancy does not create a separate exemption from benefits rules. Statutory redundancy pay and any enhanced redundancy payment can increase your capital and affect means-tested benefits, while final wages and holiday pay can affect a Universal Credit assessment period as earnings.

The practical impact depends on the total amount, your existing savings, your household circumstances and the benefits you claim. Someone with little capital who receives a modest redundancy payment may see a reduction only. Someone whose combined savings and settlement payment exceed the relevant threshold may lose entitlement for a period.

A fair settlement should still be assessed on its own merits. If the offer is intended to compensate for notice, loss of employment rights or a disputed dismissal, the potential effect on benefits is one part of the decision, not the whole decision.

Before you commit to an agreement, make sure you understand the payment breakdown and keep a copy of every version you receive. Clear independent advice can help you decide whether the terms protect your employment interests, while early benefits advice can prevent an unexpected gap in your income.

A settlement agreement can bring an employment relationship to a clear and agreed end, but the document may also affect what you can do after you leave. Restrictive covenants are often one of the most significant parts to check, particularly if you intend to join a competitor, contact former clients or set up on your own.

They are not automatically unfair simply because they limit your options. Equally, they are not automatically enforceable because they appear in a contract or settlement agreement. Their effect depends on the wording, your role, the business interest being protected and the circumstances in which the restriction is used. Before signing, it is worth understanding exactly what you are being asked to agree to – and whether the compensation reflects that commitment.

What are restrictive covenants?

Restrictive covenants are contractual promises that limit certain activities after employment ends. They commonly appear in a contract of employment and may be repeated, varied or reaffirmed in a settlement agreement.

Employers use them to protect legitimate business interests, such as confidential information, customer relationships, supplier connections and the stability of their workforce. They should not simply prevent someone from earning a living or remove ordinary competition from the market.

A settlement agreement may state that your existing restrictions continue unchanged. It may introduce new terms, extend the duration of earlier restrictions or clarify how they will operate after your employment ends. This is why an agreement should be read alongside your original employment contract, any later variations and, where relevant, bonus or share-plan documents.

The restrictive covenants you may see

The exact drafting varies, but most post-termination restrictions fall into a small number of categories.

Non-compete restrictions

A non-compete clause prevents you from working for, being involved with or sometimes investing in a competing business for a defined period. It may apply to a particular sector, service line, geographical area or group of clients.

This is often the most commercially significant restriction. A broad clause can make it difficult to accept a new role quickly, even where your proposed employer operates across a much wider market than your former employer. The practical question is not only whether the clause might be enforceable, but whether a new employer will be prepared to wait or take the risk.

Non-solicitation and non-dealing restrictions

A non-solicitation clause generally prevents you from approaching former clients, customers, suppliers or employees to encourage them to move. A non-dealing clause is wider: it may stop you from doing business with certain clients even if they approach you first.

The difference matters. If you work in sales, recruitment, consulting or a relationship-led role, a non-dealing restriction can affect the clients you are able to serve in your next position. The agreement should make clear which people or organisations are covered, often by reference to those you dealt with during a defined period before leaving.

Non-poaching restrictions

These clauses limit efforts to recruit former colleagues. They are commonly included for managers, senior specialists and employees with influence over teams.

A carefully drafted restriction may be reasonable where it protects a team from targeted approaches. A clause that appears to stop ordinary professional contact, or affects every employee regardless of whether you worked with them, may be harder to justify.

Confidentiality and trade secrets

Confidentiality obligations are sometimes described separately from restrictive covenants, but they often work alongside them. They may prevent the use or disclosure of confidential business information after employment ends. Protection for genuine trade secrets can potentially last longer than a typical non-compete or client restriction.

A settlement agreement will also usually contain its own confidentiality clause about the negotiations and the agreement itself. That is different from a restriction on using business information. Both should be reviewed, including any exceptions for speaking to a spouse or partner, professional advisers, HMRC, a regulator, the police or where disclosure is required by law.

Are restrictive covenants enforceable in the UK?

Post-termination restrictions are generally enforceable only if they go no further than reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate business interest. Courts look closely at the position when the covenant was agreed, rather than with the benefit of hindsight after a dispute has arisen.

There is no single acceptable time limit. A three-month restriction may be reasonable for one employee and excessive for another. Six or twelve months may be easier to justify for a senior executive with access to key client relationships, strategic plans or sensitive pricing information. It depends on the role, the industry, the information involved and how long the employer genuinely needs protection.

Scope is just as important as duration. A restriction may be vulnerable if it covers clients you never dealt with, activities outside your actual role, or a territory where the employer has no meaningful business. It may also be difficult to enforce if vague terms leave you unable to tell what work is prohibited.

However, an arguable legal challenge is not the same as a stress-free outcome. An employer may seek an urgent court injunction if it believes a former employee is about to breach a restriction. That can create expense, delay and uncertainty for you and your new employer. Clear advice before signing is therefore far more valuable than having to assess the wording under pressure later.

Why settlement agreements need particular care

Signing a settlement agreement normally involves waiving specified statutory employment claims in return for agreed compensation. The agreement must meet legal requirements, including that you receive independent legal advice for the waiver to be valid.

That legal advice should not be treated as a formality. It is an opportunity to examine the whole document, including restrictive covenants, confidentiality, agreed reference wording, payment terms, tax treatment and notice arrangements.

For some employees, the proposed settlement payment is enough to justify a period outside the market. For others, a non-compete term could interfere with a planned move, reduce future earnings or place them at a disadvantage when speaking to recruiters. If the employer is seeking a new or wider post-termination restriction, that may be a reason to negotiate both the wording and the financial package.

It also matters whether you are placed on garden leave. Garden leave can keep you employed, paid and bound by your contractual duties during your notice period. Employers sometimes combine garden leave with post-termination restrictions. The overall period during which you cannot compete may be commercially important, even where each clause looks ordinary in isolation.

Terms worth checking before you sign

Start by identifying whether the settlement agreement preserves existing covenants or creates additional obligations. A clause saying that you confirm or reaffirm restrictions can have real consequences, especially if there is doubt over whether an earlier contract was properly issued or varied.

Then look at the defined terms. Who counts as a restricted client, prospective client, supplier, employee or competitor? Is the definition tied to people you had material dealings with, responsibility for or confidential knowledge about? The more precise the wording, the easier it is to understand and the less likely it is to capture irrelevant relationships.

Check the duration and when it begins. A restriction may run from the termination date, the end of garden leave or another stated date. It should be clear whether periods overlap or run consecutively.

Consider your next step realistically. If you have already been offered a new role, compare the restriction with the duties, market and client base of that role. If you are not yet sure what comes next, think about the work you may reasonably want to pursue. You do not need to disclose more to your employer than is necessary, but you should obtain advice based on your actual plans.

Finally, check whether the agreement requires you to tell a prospective employer about the restrictions or provide a copy of them. This can be reasonable in some senior roles, but the obligation should be clear and proportionate.

What can be negotiated?

Restrictive covenants are often negotiable, particularly where they are newly introduced or substantially expanded. A practical negotiation may seek a shorter non-compete period, a narrower list of clients, removal of a non-dealing restriction or an express carve-out for a known future role.

In some cases, the sensible outcome is not removing every restriction. An employer may have a genuine interest in protecting confidential information or a small group of key clients. Narrowing the clause to those interests can give the employer reassurance while allowing you to move on with confidence.

Compensation can also be part of the discussion. If you are being asked to accept a restriction that meaningfully limits your career options, it is reasonable to consider whether the settlement payment reflects that value. The answer will depend on your seniority, notice entitlement, the strength of any potential claims and the terms already in your contract.

Get clarity before committing

A restrictive covenant may affect your next job long after the settlement payment has been spent. Do not assume the wording is standard, harmless or beyond discussion. Independent legal advice can explain what the clause means in plain English, identify where the commercial risk sits and help you decide whether to sign as drafted or seek better terms.

A fair agreement should give both sides certainty: your employer can protect what genuinely needs protection, and you can leave with a clear understanding of the opportunities still open to you.